10.4 “Lite” Business Cases

10.4.1 Why Business Cases Matter—Even for Quick Wins

Business cases provide a structured rationale for undertaking an initiative. They answer key questions such as:

  • Why should we do this project?
  • How will it support our strategic goals?
  • What are the costs, risks, and expected benefits?

For quick-win projects, a “lite” business case ensures you maintain clarity of purpose and secure basic endorsement without the overhead of a lengthy document. It becomes the guiding reference for decision-makers and stakeholders, helping them see alignment with strategic or operational objectives.

Key Reasons “Lite” Business Cases Are Crucial

  1. Clarity of Scope and Objectives: A brief yet focused document keeps teams aligned on what they’re solving and why it matters.
  2. Resource Allocation: Even a small project needs basic cost-benefit insights to justify resource usage.
  3. Stakeholder Buy-In: Presenting a concise, well-structured rationale eases the approval process and increases stakeholder confidence.
  4. Risk Awareness: Even a short form can highlight top risks and how you plan to address them.

10.4.2 Core Components of a “Lite” Business Case

A full-scale business case for a major transformation project can be dozens of pages. In contrast, a “lite” version should fit on one or two pages, focusing on critical information:

  1. Project Purpose and Objectives
    • Problem Statement: Briefly describe the issue or opportunity.
    • Desired Outcome: Define the goal of the quick-win project (e.g., reduce manual effort by 30%).
    • Strategic Alignment: Link the project to broader IT or corporate objectives (e.g., operational efficiency, digital transformation).
  2. Estimated Costs and Benefits
    • Cost Overview: Provide a rough estimate of budget, broken down by major cost categories if possible (e.g., labor, software licensing).
    • Benefit Projection: Offer high-level quantitative or qualitative benefits (e.g., hours saved, improved user satisfaction, faster processing times).
    • Basic ROI or Payback Estimate: If feasible, include a simple calculation like ROI or payback period (how long until savings offset costs?).
  3. High-Level Timeline
    • Phases: Outline key milestones (start date, mid-checkpoint, completion).
    • Duration: Emphasize how quickly the project can deliver value (typically a few weeks or months).
  4. Risk and Mitigation
    • Top 3–5 Risks: Identify major threats that could derail the project (e.g., dependencies on specific resources, vendor delays).
    • Mitigation Strategies: Provide a brief plan for handling these risks or contingencies.
  5. Key Stakeholders and Roles
    • Sponsor: Name the executive or senior manager championing the project.
    • Project Lead: Identify who is responsible for day-to-day execution.
    • Supporting Teams: Mention any crucial departments or functions contributing (e.g., finance, operations, compliance).
  6. Success Criteria
    • KPIs or Metrics: List measurable indicators of project success (e.g., cost savings, user adoption rate).
    • Acceptance Criteria: Clearly define how you’ll determine the project is complete and successful.

10.4.3 Leveraging Templates

A one-page or two-page business case template can streamline the process across multiple quick-win projects. Standard elements might include:

  • Header with project name, sponsor, date, and version control.
  • Brief Summary/Executive Overview (2–3 sentences).
  • Sections for Purpose, Costs/Benefits, Timeline, Risks, and Approvals.
  • Sign-Off area for the sponsor or steering committee.

By using a consistent template, stakeholders learn where to look for critical information and can quickly review multiple proposals in a standardized fashion.


10.4.4 Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

  1. Over-Promising Benefits
    • Pitfall: Inflating potential savings or ROI to get quick approval.
    • Solution: Use conservative, evidence-based estimates; it’s better to exceed expectations than to fall short.
  2. Missing Strategic Link
    • Pitfall: Presenting a project as a standalone idea with no clear tie to larger objectives.
    • Solution: In one or two sentences, highlight how the project supports or enables specific IT or business goals.
  3. Ignoring Dependencies
    • Pitfall: Forgetting to mention key resources or external factors (e.g., vendor availability, cross-team cooperation).
    • Solution: In the risk or resource sections, identify these critical dependencies so they can be managed.
  4. Excessive Detail
    • Pitfall: Turning a “lite” business case into a mini-novel with cumbersome spreadsheets and exhaustive narratives.
    • Solution: Keep it high-level; for quick-win projects, a short cost-benefit overview is usually enough.

10.4.5 Practical Examples

  • Workflow Automation: “Lite” business case might show 10 hours saved per week by automating manual data entry. Cost is a small software subscription and a few days of an IT specialist’s time.
  • Small-Scale Pilot for a New Tool: The document might highlight a test group of users, a four-week implementation timeline, modest licensing costs, and a projected improvement in process accuracy.

10.4.6 Ensuring Sponsorship and Approval

A “lite” business case should be easy to circulate and quick to read. Many organizations use:

  • Email Circulation: Send a short summary with the business case attached to key decision-makers.
  • Steering Committee Review: Present the highlights in a 5–10 minute briefing, focusing on top-line value and risks.
  • Executive Sponsor Sign-Off: Ideally, the business case ends with formal sign-off from the sponsor or a simple green light at a steering committee meeting.

The goal is to accelerate the path to approval, making sure you can start your quick-win initiative promptly.


10.4.7 Final Thoughts on “Lite” Business Cases

A “lite” business case is a key tool in ensuring transparent, efficient decision-making for quick wins. It balances the need for strategic alignment and financial rationale with a low-overhead approach that keeps initiatives moving swiftly. By adopting a concise, well-structured format, CIOs and IT leaders can standardize how quick-win projects are proposed, evaluated, and approved, reinforcing a culture of discipline and accountability without stifling speed and innovation.


Summary

Section 10.4 underscores that a brief, high-impact business case is essential to justify and guide quick-win projects. By covering just enough details—objectives, costs, benefits, timeline, risk, and success criteria—you ensure stakeholders understand why the project matters and how it will deliver value. This low-friction approach enables faster decision-making and helps build organizational confidence in PPM as an effective framework for continuous improvement.

Last Updated: